Dark Skies

The Blue Star

by: Rodney Kawecki 2017.12

There is blue radiation of a frozen dark star that is deeply embedded in the surface crescent of dark space and is radiating as a gamma medium at the surface from the deep cold dark vacuum elemental expansion of space.  In reality the universe is an arced stretch of this star so far deeply engraved inside its invisible space she’ll it’s presents is the reflection of a dark hole. It’s was left over by a great explosion now powerlessis what was left behind burnt frozen molded and smothered out but even today still arcs the upper event horizon for the life of a young accelerating universe. This gravity arkin is what sustains liven left behind debris from a gigantic explosion known as and from the beginning of time was the big bang.

Before we go any further about the blue star let's review some facts about gravity and speed. According to Einstein traveling at the speed of light is a subatomic speed limit. Meaning according to GRT a ship cannot travel faster than light can. There is nothing  on Earth that can travel  faster. These figures were define by Einstein a hundred years ago. Ata time before it was discovered that the universe was still in a process of expansion and it was growing bigger. The idea about light speed was designed with the idea a mass which is defined as a piece of matter retaining an energy type absorption and interaction could not absorb more energy than its nucleus could handle. That meant that a mass could not travel faster than the speed of light and that its energy containment the amount of energy it could absorb was relative to its atomic mass measured at the speed of light. Not only could a chunk of mass not travel faster than light it could not absorb more energy that the velocity represented in energy at the speed of light. Einstein's theories were all thought true until it was discovered a mass could travel faster than light. That it is space itself aninvisible dark bluish and repulsive vacuum that was separating galaxies apart fromeach other at a distance further away than the eye could see.  The universe was traveling at a speed expanding faster than thespeed  of light so based on general relativity a mass ship traveling though space now had the space to travel at a velocity faster than light. This meant the GRT and what was known as the universal speed limit was not an actual fact of physics' no matter the position  of the observer.

But what did all this really mean? Well let's look at it a different way. We have an atom built and around this atom is a shell where inside is a nucleus and a specific amount of electrons orbiting around this nucleus. Where this atom resides based on the energy in its area the atom will absorb the specific amount of energy that exist in its affinity but that affinity cannot outweighthe energy necessary thatwill drive a ship to the velocity of light.  Reviewing Isaac Newton's theory of earth's gravity a falling mass of hollow matter will absorb the same specific amount of energy existing in its vicinity. In earth's atmosphere its surface is layered with an energy content of 5.512g/cm3 where a falling will gain that specific amount of energy each second of time ona clock it falls gaining not only mass and velocity but also energy. In other words it is energy that accounts for a masses weight when it hits the ground.

The idea relative to general relativity was that a limit is implied on a mass and the amount of energy it can absorb whether in free fall or just traveling though space. But as I have said the universe's gravity moves much more faster than the velocity of its light so a moving mass has more space than it has energy to be absorbed traveling though empty space vacuum. The fact is that in space where the least of energy exist at all throughout the dark element a generating mass absorbs almost no mass energy during space flight because there exist none in the totality of the realm of space. But when we look at a mass or chunk of matter confined within a limiting realm or an atmosphere where the energy of a planets realm can be defined like earths can this density is what accounts for the amount of energy the mass will absorb.

Gravity on earth is measured by the amount of energy or the density of its energy within its atmosphere and how close and far away a mass resides from its ground or surface where in space gravity is defined as the affect of a chunk of matter being pushed away from the space around it. In the same way  as space is repulsive in space the universe spins at a greater velocity than even the largest galaxies and is expanding getting bigger every second bulging like an inflating balloon. The calculus of the universes' density defined by these affects and actions define its gravity and therefore how fast a mass can travel through its space. But to define its gravity a mass has to be accounted for while it's at rest. While momentum creates a repulsing push force from the space element the masses velocity is elevated by the zero energy climate. A planet sphere can therefore be observed to define the gravity force implied by space. A planet, star or galaxy at rest has no attached force for momentum tothe space therefore it is at rest. Unlike a ship a planet or a star is pushed into motion by the repulsing push force of the dark space around it causing it to be pushed away axised and to be put into a spin notat all as relativity defines these activities.It depends not on the weight of the planet because its energy is dormant and without interaction. So the star or even a galaxy is pushed into a space gravitation lending curvature against the evolving and expanding space around it. To the spaces view the galaxies  are getting  smaller and further away from one another there is no attraction. It is in this way that a space grid or surface in space is defined. The spin of the universe is what forms an elliptical path for a planet or galaxies path from another.

We again look at energy existing in a confined atmosphere or realm creating the planets shell. Inside this closed realm exist the amount of the planets density in layers getting thicker traveling down towards the surface or getting thinner traveling upwards towards the sky. Specifically noteworthy the specific amount of this energy is accounted for from about 16 miles above a planet's surface. I would say about 1.6 feet on the Moon. Using Newton's measurements each second of free fall accounts for doubling the amount of energy absorbed by a mass increasing its speed but not its weight.  It’s weight is measured by the amount  of energy it regulates at and cannot be retained till its at rest. Energy is a electrical generating mechanism and is a force but used to form it. The forces a mass at rest is its weight not is energy or is potential it creates only a spark of its purpose.

The amount of energy that can be absorbed by a atomic shell is based on the amount of energy in the field of the defined dwelling. If the density occurred in the atmosphere around an active mass is greater than the density occurred at the speed of light the nucleus of the atom' will explode if thedensity is smaller the atom will stay stabilize. What defines how much energy a mass can absorb?  The atomic masses nucleus can absorb only so much energy it is a closed system. In the event too much energy is attracted towards it its nucleus will first break-down then it will explode. It was for this reason Albert Einstein disclosed a universal speed limit not by the calamity of the universe itself but by the confines of a closed system like earth.

It is in the manner by which one much speak about a gravity force that its possibilities are revealed. An atom is an empty chunk of matter with no energy exceptfor tiny repulsive subcomponentscalled electrons unless acted upon by a secondary mass nearby it. A single chunk of matter will not generate any greater generated energy unless bound by a secondary source of similar components. Wheresimilar masses repel likethoseof two close positive poles Newton’stheory on two nearby masses at a distance could be wrong. I mean why would two positively charged batteries attract? Why do smaller masies orbit the larger. On earth a moving mass is calibrated by the planets density mass it is a closed system. The universe on the other hand is an open system that is in actual expansion and physically accelerating and getting larger every second as time passes. We can look upon planets and stars as enlightened masses bounding away from each other is a formal dance and balance act. They are similar and therefore repel each other's energy. They sink into the fabric of the space because of the universe's angular pushing them away yet they fall spinning slowly away from it. Why because there exist no direct contact between their energies. A galaxies mass is pushed away spinning deep into a pushing pool of space.

Faster than light also known as superluminal or FTL communication and travel refer to the propagation of information or matter faster than the speed of light. The special theory of relativity implies that only a particle with zero rest mass may travel at the speed of light. Tachyon' hypothetical particles whose speed  exceeds that of light have been hypothesized but the existence of such particles violate causality and the consensus of physicists is that such particles cannot or do not even exist at all.

To an Earthbound observer objects in the sky complete one revolution around the earth in 1 day. Proxima Centuari which is the nearest star outside the solar system is about 4 light years away. On a geostationary view, Proxima Centauri has a speed many times greater than c as its rim speed of an object moving in a circle is a product of the radius and angular speed. It is also possible on a geostatic view for objects such as comets to vary their speed from subluminal to superluminal and vice versa simply because the distance from earth varies. Comets may have orbits which take them out to more than 1000 AU. The circumstance of a circle with a radius of 1000 AU is greater than one light day. In other words a comet at such a distance is superluminal in a geostatic and therefore non-inertial frame.

According to relativity a spaceship travels to a planet one light year as measured in the earth's rest frame away from earth at high speed the time taken to reach that planet could be less than one year as measured by the traveler's clock although it will always be more than one year as measured by a clock on Earth. The value obtained by dividing the distance traveled as determined in the earth's frame by the time taken measured by the traveler's clock is known as a proper speed or a proper velocity.

Since one might not travel faster than light one might conclude that a human can never travel further from earth than 40 light years of a single lifespan if the traveler is active between the age of 20 and age 60.  There exist no limit on the value as a proper speed does not represent a speed measured in a  single inertial frame. A light signal that left earth at the same time as this traveler will always get to the destination earlier and before the traveler due the signal launched is non-massive wear compared to the traveler retaining a massive body wear.

Accordingly, if a spaceship accelerates at a constant 1 g in its own changing frame of reference it will after 354 days reach speeds which described in relativity will cause it to slow down. Nothing can traveler faster than light speed. But what we have discovered is that in space the fundamentals of statical communication of humanity signals, speech, sound, non-vacuum stimulations do not occur in space. It is also reasoned that since in an expanding universe something traveling close to reach light velocity will travel faster due to the lack of waves and there  resistance.

A ship traveling through a vacuum is travelling unattached to the binding rest mass of the space fabric that like all planets and stars including the galaxies are attached to an orbit at rest with. It is therefore assuring to say that an accelerating ship will travel its engine and instrument panels propulsion capacity and are non-inertially attached by resistance clash waves made by the fabric's space surface.  A ship in space according to its instruments can accelerate at a constant 1 g on its own but is not tied to the same inertial forces as those on earth. If the planets were supported by relativity theory nothing would travel faster than 93,000 m/s due to the equilibriums inertial space mass but traveling in its vacuum state of space does not support any increase due to any inertial field as relativity predicts. This separation between space surface and space vacuum is what carries the load in an non-inertial system.

A ship that travels through space travelof flight is above the rest mass of the space fabric and is not tied to its parameter measurements. As such in the vacuum the ship mass is not attached to it and travels allusive above and beyond its capacity and even that speed increases instead of decreasing as remained in relativity.  According to Quanta Physics Theory the vacuum has no real mass or attachment in the same way as light has no real mass whereas the fabric of space does at its surface.

Using the models of an expanding universe the farther galaxies are away from each other the faster they drift apart. This receding is not due to the material planetary motion through space but rather by the expansion of the space itself. Galaxies far away from Earth appear to be moving away from the Earth with a speed proportional to their distances. Beyond the boundary called the Hubble sphere the rate at which their distance is accelerating is 43 miles a second every 3 million miles and accordingly from Earth increases there become greater than the speed of light.

These sums by Edwin Hubble have recalculated by Rodney Kawecki in his Quanta Physics Theory books he has published that reinvent new measurements that measure how fast an object like a space ship has the ability to travel within the coordinate mass value in Hubble's mathematics. Kawecki has reinvented new technology that will published in his next book about the universe and will venture new mathematics about its actual age, size its mass and its intentions for in the future. He'll answer questions of why the universe is expanding, how long it will in the future, he predicts why and what will happen to the universe in its evolution and what the universe's future holds for it and our future as inhabitants. 

In relativity the universe is asserted by a flat and closed system using Hubble Receding show that the universe is not fixed as Einstein asserted a hundred years ago but is actually growing larger. The assertions made by relativity today have outreached their parameters and new one's should be inserted. One of these parameters is The Blue Star.